Jose Canseco Loses a Finger, While Daniel Colman Wags One at Hellmuth

Jose Canseco Loses a Finger, While Daniel Colman Wags One at Hellmuth

Resigned MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) throughout a poker competition last week.

Jose Canseco was the figure that is central a weekend for the poker globe that has been filled with fingers: some missing, some pointed at prominent names within the poker community. In Canseco’s case, he appears to have lost the same hand for the second time in about a month, a thing that few people (with any luck) will ever get to experience.

In late October, Canseco had been in the news for accidentally shooting himself in the hand. Based on Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleaning his weapon in his kitchen. He finished up shooting their hand, which then must be surgically reattached. It appears some surgeons are more skilled than other people at digital fixes, though.

Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament

According to a tweet sent down by Canseco on however, the finger became detached again while he was playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening friday.

‘ I became playing in a poker competition final night and my finger dropped of,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘Someone took a video from it.’

Fortunately, Canseco didn’t post that video, however there clearly was at least one expected image of his finger before it dropped off. As gruesome as the event may however sound, Canseco said that this result may have been unavoidable from the time he shot himself.

‘My little finger should have been amputated right from the start,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘It was extremely loose with no bone tissue for connecting it. It had been also smelling really bad.’

There was no word on whether or not Canseco won the hand to create up for losing the little finger. Previously, Canseco’s fingers were best-known for gripping bats during his 17-year major league profession being a professional baseball player, during which he hit 462 home runs.

Colman Offers Hellmuth the Verbal Finger

Meanwhile, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly connected, of his own at 13-time global World Series of Poker bracelet winner Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some harsh comments about Hellmuth in a thread in regards to the latter’s recent appearance on a podcast hosted by Rounders journalist Brian Koppelman.

‘Its embarrassing that we have to share whores like this guy to our profession,’ Colman wrote. ‘After we win one drop, he immediately comes on stage to shake my hand in front of a camera and congratulate me personally. As though he’s the gatekeeper towards the poker world and welcoming me in.

‘It is truly pathetic that a 40 old would behave the way he does at the table, not to mention how spineless he is, just willing to take any sponsorship regardless of the company’s integrity,’ the $22 million winner waxed on year. ‘ Really makes me sad to think there’s a chance some social people may look as much as this charlatan. People of their mindset and character certainly are a cancer to the global globe.’

Hellmuth was apparently hurt and surprised by the responses, and responded quickly to them on Twitter.

‘Ouch, we was simply assaulted big style on a terrific poker forum,’ Hellmuth tweeted. ‘It was personal and it hurts, but I am proud associated with man I am!’

For their part, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was a touch too harsh, and chose to back the tone off of his post, even if he stood behind the message.

‘we acknowledge to being too harsh in my initial post. Phil didn’t deserve that hateful of the message,’ Colman later wrote. ‘Having said that, I still stand by the gist that is main of post. Phil’s behavior in poker is atrocious, and I also don’t believe it belongs in this game.’

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver says that US sports that are legal should really be regulated in america. (Image: USATSI)

Can appropriate US activities betting, across the board, be a thing ever? a astonishing proponent has emerged in the shape of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.

Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The nyc Times recently, stating that he thinks it is time to allow sports gambling to happen legally throughout the United States. That stance is in opposition compared to that of all major recreations organizations in the USA, including the previously held position by the NBA and its commissioner that is former Stern.

‘Betting on professional sports happens to be illegal in all of the usa outside of Nevada,’ Silver said from the beginning of his opinion piece. ‘we think we require an alternative approach.’

Currently Illegal generally in most States

Silver went on to describe the present state of sports wagering in the USA.

In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that already had some as a type of the betting available. Nevada is the only state with full activities betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon also have the best to offer more restricted types of sports-based gambling.

As Silver states, the NBA, as well as other sports leagues and companies in the usa, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing sports wagering for decades. But which hasn’t stopped individuals from gambling on the games, regardless of the lack of a legal, regulated option.

‘But despite legal restrictions, sports gambling is widespread,’ Silver wrote. ‘It is a thriving business that is underground operates free from regulation or oversight. Because there are few appropriate possibilities, those who would like to bet resort to illicit bookmaking operations and shady overseas sites.’

In accordance with Silver, some estimates put the volume of illegal sports betting within the United States at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per 12 months. That dwarfs the quantity of legal activities betting that occurs in nevada casinos and other locations in Nevada.

Trends Point Towards Regulation

Within the piece, Silver writes concerning the ‘domestic and global trends’ towards regulation of recreations betting. He points out that a lot of states now offer at least some form of legal gambling, and that online gambling has already been managed in three states. As a result, he says, it’s time for Congress to enact new legislation to replace PASPA.

‘Congress should adopt a framework that is federal allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, topic to strict regulatory needs and technological safeguards,’ he wrote.

Silver has previously made remarks suggesting he would be thinking about seeing regulated sports wagering in the United States, though here is the very first time he has organized his place in full. Other sports leagues declined to touch upon Silver’s stance.

Cuban Backs Silver’s Stance

Nevertheless, a minumum of one NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told that ‘Adam has it exactly appropriate.’

‘In the past for PR reasons, we have actually put up token opposition to them,’ Cuban said. ‘I agree with Adam that now is the time to take sports betting from the shadows and deal along with it such as the huge business it is.’

Despite Silver’s remarks, however, New Jersey shouldn’t expect the NBA to pull out of the lawsuit that is aiming to stop the state from allowing activities betting to continue at its gambling enterprises and racetracks.

‘Without a comprehensive federal solution, state measures such as for instance brand New Jersey’s recent effort are going to be both unlawful and bad public policy,’ Silver had written.

Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson Internet Poker Ban Arrange

Ron Paul laid out their arguments against an online gambling ban that is strongly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)

Ron Paul has used their weekly column for the Ron Paul Institute to argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of Us citizens and will be taken up limited to the advantage of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.

The previous Republican Representative from Texas called legislation that is such example of ‘cronyism,’ something he states that many Americans are against irrespective of their political ideologies.

‘For instance, Congress may soon vote on legislation Internet that is outlawing gambling’ Paul had written.

‘It is an open key, at least inside the Beltway, that this legislation is being considered as a favor to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, who is perhaps best known for using his enormous wealth to advance a pro-war international policy, is now using his governmental impact to turn their online competitors into crooks.’

Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March

Paul’s words make reference to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that ended up being introduced by Republicans in both homes of Congress in March, and has now since selected up tiny but notable quantities of bipartisan help in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw most forms of on line gambling during the level that is federal really changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just activities betting, since it is currently interpreted.

Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the reasons that are various for supporting the ban in an attempt to show that it was really only being considered for the sake of Adelson.

‘Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are motivated by a desire to curry benefit with a donor that is wealthy’ Paul wrote. ‘ Instead, they give a true amount of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some declare that legalizing online gambling will enrich criminals and even terrorists! But criminalizing online gambling enterprises will not get rid of the need for online casinos. Instead, passage of this legislation will guarantee that the likely online gambling market is controlled by criminals.’

Paul Criticizes States’ Rights Argument

Certainly one of play quick hits slot machine online free the( that is major to many, perplexing) arguments utilized by supporters of RAWA is such a ban would really protect states’ rights. Paul explained their argument before laying away his reasoning for why it was faulty.

‘Their argument is the fact that citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get around those guidelines by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,’ Paul stated. ‘ Regardless if the argument had merit that permitting states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it wouldn’t normally justify legislation that is federal the issue…arguing that ‘states rights’ justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which had been intended to restrict federal power, on its mind.’

Paul presented several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing his opposition to an online gambling ban.

‘The proposed ban on Internet gambling is an infringement that is blatantly unconstitutional our liberties that may probably expand the surveillance state,’ he concluded. ‘Worst of most, it is all being done for the main benefit of one powerful billionaire.’

RAWA is unlikely to receive a hearing or see much movement in Congress through the current duck session that is lame. However, its prospects could improve in the next Congress, when Republicans will have majorities in both the home and Senate.

Comments are closed.

image image image